Lifestyle and Daily Shenanigans with a dash of Nerd Appreciation thrown in.
Willkommen!
Hello, there! I'm Mochizuki, a twenty-something year old Graphic & Web Design student located somewhere in America and welcome to Waiting for June a Lifestyle blog that occasionally gets a tad too personal, talks about cosmetics, and constantly the home for prattles about Bandcamp, nerd culture, and tea/coffee. To find out more about blog and the blogger, click here.
Thank you so much for visiting and reading Waiting for June! If you like what we do here and want to help support the addiction of the blogger, you should look into spoiling the blog and its creator with coffee and gifts by using the links below. Even if you don't, you're still pretty dope for visiting, reading, enjoying, et cetera.
On Saturday, I went out with two of my good mates to the cinema partly because one of my mates wanted to see Prisoners, partly because we hadn't properly hung out with each other in a week or two, and partly because we wanted to hang out a couple more times before I moved a bit away. So, it was decided that day that we would head to the cinema. Initially, we were going to see Rush because that is what I, personally, wanted to see, but Prisoners was instead decided on. We opted to go to the 10:20 one which one of my mates, the time to work and change and grab us, and also gave me the time to hang out with a group of others.
When ten rolled around we headed out and of course, I made my friend make a pit stop so that I could hit up Starbucks and get a drink. Of course, the ride to Starbucks and then the cinema was filled with ridiculousness, but I can never properly explain it and it's better when seen for yourself. The movie started roughly around 10:35 and we left about 12:50 in the morning. I live tweeted about the movie for a good bit, but for a movie over 2 hours long, you can bet there's quite a lot left to say.
So...가자!
This post may contain what you may personally consider spoilers, however, it was not in my intention to do so. That being said, this post contains my opinion and mine alone. I was not asked to post this nor am I being compensated in any way, shape, or form to offer my opinion; let alone make this post. Again, this in my opinion and that makes it a subjective view. It should be taken for what it is, but only at face value and you are welcomed to form and offer your opinions on this post and its subject.
Before you go to watch this movie or bring your mates to watch this movie, please note that the movie is rated R for a reason. The movie includes violent themes, torture scenes (both graphic and not as graphic), language, and may be (slightly) triggering to some people in some way. Please watch this movie with this thought in mind.
As per usual, I'll start this off by talking about the basics. What is Prisoners ? Prisoners is a two hour, twenty six minute long mystery, suspense, and dramatic movie directed by Denis Villeneuve, written by Aaron Guzikowski, and produced by Warner Bros that was released on September 20, 2013. The movie stars Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Melissa Leo, Paul Dano, Viola Davis, Terrance Howard, Erin Gerasimovich, and Kyla-Drew Simmons. What is Prisoners about? Keller Dover is facing every parent's worst nightmare. His six-year-old daughter, Anna, is missing, together with her young friend, Joy, and as the minutes turn to hours, panic sets in. The only lead is a dilapidated RV that had earlier been parked on their street. Heading the investigation, Detective Loki arrests its driver, Alex Jones, but a lack of evidence forces the only suspect's release. Knowing his child's life is at stake, the frantic Dover decides he has no choice but to take matters into his own hands. But just how far will this desperate father go to protect his family?
Promotional Trailer: The first promotional trailer for the movie, Prisoners. // Courtesy of MOVIECLIPS Trailers.
Prisoners is a bit of doozy at face value, but is extremely predictable when you sit down and properly think about it. I won't sit here and say that I didn't enjoy the movie, because that is not the case whatsoever. I will say, however, that for a movie that was 2 hours and 26 minutes long, I managed to figure out what was what and who was what within the first half hour and cemented it by the first hour in. For what it was, Prisoners was far, far too draggy and unnecessarily long. That being said, I did rather enjoy the numerous plot twists that were involved in the movie, I like that once you figured it out or once you were on the right track, something would occur that would cause you to pause and think, "Am I truly on the right path here?" For someone like me, who easily gets bored when a movie becomes too predictable and the plot twists do not suffice, the twists in the movie actually made me not as bored and tired of it as I would have normally been.
The real winners in this movie are Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Paul Dano, and Terrence Howard. Hands down these four men, to me, carried the movie...especially Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal. So I can not not applaud them. Paul Dano played magnificently as the shy, slightly creepy, almost childike character who you immediately latched onto as the ideal suspect. Hugh Jackman was, by far, my favourite part of the movie as he so perfectly played the role of a father who is driven to the brink of insanity and let there to dally as he rushes against time to find one of the most important things to him. Considering that the last thing I saw Hugh Jackman in was The Wolverine and I happen to think his portrayal of Wolverine is sub par in comparison to what I believe he could do with the character, seeing him in this was like a slap to the face and a damned good reminder that he is far from subpar. Jake Gyllenhaal, to me, is flawless when given roles like Detective Loki; the loner who lives in his own world, but is determined and strong in what can be a really subtle or strong manner. As someone who grew up watching Donnie Darko as a child and loving it (and to this day, I still do), I knew what to expect when I found out what type of character he would be playing. Also, the addition of Detective Loki also loses his mind was a flawless idea and while it could have been executed better, I can't complain too much. Finally, the huge shocker for me was Terrence Howard. When I first was watching the movie, I hadn't realised it was him at all. He had slimmed down a tad for the movie and the way I was sitting was not ideal for looking at his face in the beginning parts of the movie. It wasn't until I got a good look at his face that I realised who it was. I won't lie, I was genuinely surprised that it was him as Franklin in this movie. For most people who know about Terrence Howard, they think of really intense and strong characters (i.e: James "Rhodey" Rhodes in Iron Man 1, Djay in Hustle & Flow, or Bama in Get Rich or Die Tryn'), so for him to be playing someone as meek and shy as Franklin will give you a bit of a surprise. Nonetheless, he was actually really good at it and it was because of his character that a few chuckles were pulled from the audience around me
Promotional Trailer: The second promotional trailer for the movie, Prisoners. // Courtesy of MOVIECLIPS Trailers.
Like with most movies, there are aspects of the movie that I absolutely adored and there were some things I just utterly detested and sometimes, there is more I adore or there is more I detest. In this case, I have to admit that everything was pretty even for me. There weren't many things that fell into the adore category nor in the detested category. So what does that mean? That means that most of the aspects of this movie fell right in the middle and left me feeling, "Eh, could be better."
One thing that I absolutely adored and have no problem admitting, is the plot. Honestly, I believe that anyone going to see this movie is going to see this movie for one of two reasons (or both) and that is either the plot line or the cast. I've always been intrigued by stories that seem to touch on the topics of morality and how one's morality may or may not be influenced by a particular event. I love movies that leave you wondering whether or not you would do the same in the character's shoes and whether or not your ideals of what is morally sound coincides with your choice. That was initially what intrigued me and to do this day, it's still an intriguing plot line. Now here's where this movie fell into the "Eh, could be better" with the plot line. For a movie that poses the question "How far would you go to protect your child?", I was let down slightly by how mediocre the story was executed. It started off just fine, but as time progressed, it just seemed to become more and more gimmicky. That is a problem and I was just really saddened by how mediocre it seemed to play out instead of the epicness I had in mind.
The plot line being mediocre was balanced out by not only the acting done by the main cast, but also by the torture scenes and the darkness of the movie. Allow me to explain.
When I think of situations in which torture has a possibility of arising, I think of the fact that because torture is such an intense thing in terms of wording, let alone what it can mean, I hope to see and hear about things that leave me feeling terribly uncomfortable and a bit (or a lot) squirmish. More often than not, movies kind of skimp out on the torture scenes unless it's a horror or a gory movie, so I have to admit that I hadn't had any sorts of expectations for this movie. In fact, I expected them to not even have a non-graphic torture scene and instead just allude to it. But goodness me! They did not skimp on the torture scenes and for the most part, all torture scenes were graphic but kept from reaching the point of utter discomfort by alluding to more torture being done. Now, I'll openly admit this because I have no qualms about living in my own reality, I have a tendency to laugh watching movies that have torture scenes or deaths in them simply because I just find them amusing when they occur in a movie. In this case, I can't even count the number of times I would squirm watching some of the torture scenes. Yes, I still laughed (because hi habits!) and I don't regret that, but there was something about these scenes that was part amusing and part shiver inducing for me. That is something that most forms of media can't achieve from me. It's very rare for me to read a book, watch a movie or show, or listen to something that reduces me to the shivers of any kind and for me to not only have that happen but to have my expectations proven wrong, was amazing.
Now if you couldn't tell by that previous paragraph, I'm a sucker for all things dark. I love anything that has a darker tone and (/or) theme to it. That isn't to say that everything dark is good because let's be quite honest here, that's hardly the case in some instances and it's only made harder when you take into consideration that I'm a bit hard to please when it comes to entertainment. What I appreciate about the tone of this movie is that you know as soon as the movie starts that it's going to be something really twisted, morally attacking, and completely dark. Of course, it was draggy (yes, I can't help but bring it up), but the bleariness of Thanksgiving Day as the movie makes way for the desolation and desperation of the harsher colds of the beginning of winter. I love that every scene, even ones that didn't necessarily need it, had a gritty look and tone to it.
Here's where things start to get really half way for me. For as much as I loved the plot, the dark edge to the movie, the torture scenes, and how the majority of the main male cast acted, there were things that really and truly made me unsettled about the movie. For one thing, Gracie Dover (played by Maria Bello) was someone I immediately grew to detest. There was just something about her that unsettled me and it only seemed to get worse when she decided that blaming her husband for her daughter going missing was the way to go. Personally, if I were to ever have my child taken, the last thing I would do was blame my significant other for not "keeping us safe" and "protecting us from it all". It's a level of disrespect that I couldn't even ever fathom reaching. Another thing, the siblings of the missing parties, Ralph Dover and Eliza Birch, were characters that I feel were essentially created to make siblings look like arses and teens look like psuedo-intelligent, but incredibly whiny and brattish. Both Ralph and Eliza had moments where I found myself going, "Why in the bloody hell are you even here? You are so pointless and such a non-factor that it's so bloody annoying." They had moments where they through their little fits and I almost wanted to backhand them myself. I think a part of the reason I detested Ralph and Eliza as much as I did is because they remind me of the exact opposite of what I was and my mates were as teenagers and that was incredibly bothering. If it isn't obvious, what this boils down to is the fact that most, if not all, the minor characters pissed me the hell off or just bothered me senseless.
Another thing that bothered me were the plot twists. I know that I said that they kept me from getting bored with the overall movie, but at the same time, a lot of it was unnecessary. I think there were maybe one or two twists that I was okay with, but after a while, throwing in so many plot twists and attempt to shock and confusing just got a bit annoying and it was at that point I went back to multitasking; watching the movie and live tweeting. While plot twists are good, doing too many of them grows tiresome. However, as much as I can complain about the excessive amount of plot twists, it did genuinely stop the movie from being a complete bore. If you compare the plot twists to the ambiguous and open-ended ending, the plot twists actually make up for the ending.
Speaking of the ending. Uhm, no. That's it. Just know that I stand by that: No.
I realised that if I continue writing this any further, then I'll probably end up spoiling the movie, more than I unintentionally might have already. So let's get to the nitty gritty.
I recommend this movie if you're a fan of mystery, suspense, and drama. If you're a fan of movies that question what is and isn't morally sound and whether certain situations require morality, then I'd recommend you watching this. If you're a fan of graphic torture scenes and watching characters drift into slight (or intense) insanity, I'd recommend you watching this. However, if you're easily made bored, can't stand movies that seem draggy in even the slightest manner, don't enjoy plot twists no matter the frequency, and are not appealed by ambiguous endings, then I'd say pass. Personally, I think that I should have waited for it to come to DVD because it wasn't truly worth the $11 paid for it.
When the movie's over, I welcome to answer these questions (especially if there's a group of you): What lengths would you go to protect your family, especially your child? If you were in Keller's shoes would you have handled it the same way? And finally, where do the lines of morality start blur?
Maaan, that was tiring. I really tried not to spoil the movie and that's why things may or may not seem choppy when reading it. I found it a bit everywhere, but I do hope that I've managed to make things as clear as I can with a fuzzy head and drifting in and out of exhaustion. This isn't the best review, but I assure you, it was the best of movies (nor was it the worst), so I tried. Nonetheless, I'm glad I could get this out of the way.
Thing on this blog are a little slow since I'm moving in the near, near future and I'm busy with building my portfolio. However, I have a couple things in mind for the blog like how there's going to be yet another layout update in the near future and I'll also be doing posts about episodes of shows airing during this Fall season of television. As it is, I have a couple posts in mind for Sleep Hollow and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. After I go through the fall schedule lineup and find some shows I like, I'll catch up with them and start on getting some posts out. Finally, I'm in the process of just going right ahead and making a newsletter that is actually a book club for the blog. So things are busy all around. I want to thank you lot for being patient and if you're new to following my blog (there's a couple of you), hallo!
Drop me a comment below and tell me what you're watching this season, what your plans are for the season, and whatever else tickles your fancy.
“Either write something worth reading or do something worth writing.” — Benjamin Franklin
Hello, there!
Welcome to Waiting for June. Waiting for June is a Lifestyle Blog that focuses predominantly on daily life shenanigans and nerd culture, but occasionally dabbles in health & beauty, food, and prattling about serious topics.
Waiting for June is the sixth iteration of the same blog with a different name and structure. The original iteration of this blog was started back in November of 2012 as a purely Beauty and Lifestyle blog under the name Monochromatics which later got abandoned and restarted under the name sumeoseo. With sumeoseo came more beauty and review based blog which quickly lost its appeal. From that point on, there were three name changes, multiple hiatuses, and two blog changes before coming to where we are now.
Throughout this journey, I've learned that this blog shouldn't be limited to what I feel fits in with what I read from other bloggers nor should I put myself in a position to compromise my integrity and the feeling of transparency that I feel should always be there. I've also learned that blogging is probably never going to be a huge source of income the way I always expected it to be. So when I finally returned back to blogging with a fresh blog and an equally fresh name, I decided to make this blog about anything that I wanted to and break the mold of trying to fit into the mold. I can only imagine where this experience is going to take me.
Prattle about the twenty-something university student behind the blog.
“I live in that solitude which is painful in youth, but delicious in the years of maturity.” — Albert Einstein
Hello, there!
Welcome to the little about me section of the blog. If it isn't obvious by now, I'm Mochizuki and I'm kind of pretty important here. Admittedly, Mochizuki is a nom de plume, but I digress. I'm currently somewhere in my twenty-somethings and doing that thing where I'm learning how to be a proper adult while balancing being a student and a worker. Speaking of school, I'm a Graphic Design major who's concentration is Web Design and I take my classes online. If I'm being honest here, I do everything online because of my apprehension towards too much social interaction.
I'm typically reading something, playing a video game, watching anime, or something otherwise nerdy because that's how I roll. I don't engage with people unless I'm positive there is something in common there simply because I don't want to make it weird for anyone involved. That said, the reason I originally created this blog, or rather, any of my blogging adventures, was so that I could engage with people wo share the same interests as me while simultaneously sharing my own things with people.
I'm not terribly good at about me's, so expect this to be updated sporadically in a lot of ways.
The little spots on the internet that I read to pass time.
Nunc magna felis, finibus at sem eget, elementum malesuada purus. Aliquam suscipit elit vitae magna viverra, malesuada aliquet magna iaculis. Mauris pharetra vestibulum dapibus. Fusce ullamcorper est ullamcorper orci pretium mollis. Etiam blandit at ex nec lobortis. Suspendisse vel vestibulum ante. Quisque dignissim risus vel dui sodales, a sagittis eros placerat. Donec faucibus a purus sed aliquet. Cras auctor non magna a pulvinar. Suspendisse eget viverra diam, ac condimentum tellus. Phasellus porttitor rhoncus nisi eget imperdiet. Mauris pulvinar libero metus, eu rhoncus elit egestas vitae. Phasellus ac eros non eros elementum vehicula.
Affiliations, promotions, and general advertisments associated with the blog.
Some of these advertisments, affiliations, and promotions are, in fact, compensated. That said, no amount of compensation will have any effect on the opinions on the blog. For more information on this topic, please read our disclaimer and review policies.
Currently, the blog has no affiliations, promotions, or general advertisments to display.
“A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.” — Dalai Lama
This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. For questions about this blog, please contact kurahge@outlook.com.
This blog accepts forms of cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation. The compensation received will never influence the content, topics or posts made in this blog. All advertising is in the form of advertisements generated by a third party ad network. Those advertisements will be identified as paid advertisements.
The owner(s) of this blog is compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. Even though the owner(s) of this blog receives compensation for our posts or advertisements, we always give our honest opinions, findings, beliefs, or experiences on those topics or products. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the bloggers' own. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer, provider or party in question.
This blog does not contain any content which might present a conflict of interest.
A clear and concise guide on how reviews are approached and written.
This blog touches on and is dedicated to a variety of topics including: daily life, cosmetics, my journey to being a healthier me, music, books, anime, et cetera; however, a large chunk of the content found here are some form of review be they miniature reviews or full blown, in-depth reviews. Because of this, this blog has decided to implement and share it's review policy.
Please note that this policy is liable to change at any point in time, so do constantly check back before sending inquiries to kurahge@outlook.com.
Depending on the workload and the type of product is received, at any given time, multiple products can be in queue to be reviewed.
Depending on the product, the amount of time for a review to be posted varies. Typically, the length of time is as follows: anything health or beauty releated will take between 5 days and 1 week, books take between 3 days and 5 days, music and movie reviews take between 1 to 2 days, and most other reviews are variant depending on the situation at hand.
Products are predominantly purchased with my own money. On the off chance that the product or prodcuts were provided to me, there is always a note at the top of post and as well as text within the post that acknowledges such. Despite being provided a product or not, the opinions are honest and valid.
As of April 14th, 2016, there has been a change in how reviews are formatted. If working with a product that has a list of ingredients (health, beauty, cosmetics, etcetera), there will be a graphic that lists the ingredients out of respect and transparency for the readers.
Photos for reviews, particularly health and beauty related, are unedited and provided in a clear manner to help show what results occurred (if any.)
If at any point, a review is rushed despite being informed of and knowing the review policy of this blog, I will drop the review and pay for the product accordingly. I am a college student and a full-time worker, blogging is a bit of side project no matter how much I wish it otherwise, so my time is a bit crammed. Basically, rushing will terminate any agreement we may have unless it's valid (meaning absolutely my fault.)
On Saturday, I went out with two of my good mates to the cinema partly because one of my mates wanted to see Prisoners, partly because we hadn't properly hung out with each other in a week or two, and partly because we wanted to hang out a couple more times before I moved a bit away. So, it was decided that day that we would head to the cinema. Initially, we were going to see Rush because that is what I, personally, wanted to see, but Prisoners was instead decided on. We opted to go to the 10:20 one which one of my mates, the time to work and change and grab us, and also gave me the time to hang out with a group of others.
When ten rolled around we headed out and of course, I made my friend make a pit stop so that I could hit up Starbucks and get a drink. Of course, the ride to Starbucks and then the cinema was filled with ridiculousness, but I can never properly explain it and it's better when seen for yourself. The movie started roughly around 10:35 and we left about 12:50 in the morning. I live tweeted about the movie for a good bit, but for a movie over 2 hours long, you can bet there's quite a lot left to say.
So...가자!
This post may contain what you may personally consider spoilers, however, it was not in my intention to do so. That being said, this post contains my opinion and mine alone. I was not asked to post this nor am I being compensated in any way, shape, or form to offer my opinion; let alone make this post. Again, this in my opinion and that makes it a subjective view. It should be taken for what it is, but only at face value and you are welcomed to form and offer your opinions on this post and its subject.
Before you go to watch this movie or bring your mates to watch this movie, please note that the movie is rated R for a reason. The movie includes violent themes, torture scenes (both graphic and not as graphic), language, and may be (slightly) triggering to some people in some way. Please watch this movie with this thought in mind.
As per usual, I'll start this off by talking about the basics. What is Prisoners ? Prisoners is a two hour, twenty six minute long mystery, suspense, and dramatic movie directed by Denis Villeneuve, written by Aaron Guzikowski, and produced by Warner Bros that was released on September 20, 2013. The movie stars Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Melissa Leo, Paul Dano, Viola Davis, Terrance Howard, Erin Gerasimovich, and Kyla-Drew Simmons. What is Prisoners about? Keller Dover is facing every parent's worst nightmare. His six-year-old daughter, Anna, is missing, together with her young friend, Joy, and as the minutes turn to hours, panic sets in. The only lead is a dilapidated RV that had earlier been parked on their street. Heading the investigation, Detective Loki arrests its driver, Alex Jones, but a lack of evidence forces the only suspect's release. Knowing his child's life is at stake, the frantic Dover decides he has no choice but to take matters into his own hands. But just how far will this desperate father go to protect his family?
Promotional Trailer: The first promotional trailer for the movie, Prisoners. // Courtesy of MOVIECLIPS Trailers.
Prisoners is a bit of doozy at face value, but is extremely predictable when you sit down and properly think about it. I won't sit here and say that I didn't enjoy the movie, because that is not the case whatsoever. I will say, however, that for a movie that was 2 hours and 26 minutes long, I managed to figure out what was what and who was what within the first half hour and cemented it by the first hour in. For what it was, Prisoners was far, far too draggy and unnecessarily long. That being said, I did rather enjoy the numerous plot twists that were involved in the movie, I like that once you figured it out or once you were on the right track, something would occur that would cause you to pause and think, "Am I truly on the right path here?" For someone like me, who easily gets bored when a movie becomes too predictable and the plot twists do not suffice, the twists in the movie actually made me not as bored and tired of it as I would have normally been.
The real winners in this movie are Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal, Paul Dano, and Terrence Howard. Hands down these four men, to me, carried the movie...especially Hugh Jackman and Jake Gyllenhaal. So I can not not applaud them. Paul Dano played magnificently as the shy, slightly creepy, almost childike character who you immediately latched onto as the ideal suspect. Hugh Jackman was, by far, my favourite part of the movie as he so perfectly played the role of a father who is driven to the brink of insanity and let there to dally as he rushes against time to find one of the most important things to him. Considering that the last thing I saw Hugh Jackman in was The Wolverine and I happen to think his portrayal of Wolverine is sub par in comparison to what I believe he could do with the character, seeing him in this was like a slap to the face and a damned good reminder that he is far from subpar. Jake Gyllenhaal, to me, is flawless when given roles like Detective Loki; the loner who lives in his own world, but is determined and strong in what can be a really subtle or strong manner. As someone who grew up watching Donnie Darko as a child and loving it (and to this day, I still do), I knew what to expect when I found out what type of character he would be playing. Also, the addition of Detective Loki also loses his mind was a flawless idea and while it could have been executed better, I can't complain too much. Finally, the huge shocker for me was Terrence Howard. When I first was watching the movie, I hadn't realised it was him at all. He had slimmed down a tad for the movie and the way I was sitting was not ideal for looking at his face in the beginning parts of the movie. It wasn't until I got a good look at his face that I realised who it was. I won't lie, I was genuinely surprised that it was him as Franklin in this movie. For most people who know about Terrence Howard, they think of really intense and strong characters (i.e: James "Rhodey" Rhodes in Iron Man 1, Djay in Hustle & Flow, or Bama in Get Rich or Die Tryn'), so for him to be playing someone as meek and shy as Franklin will give you a bit of a surprise. Nonetheless, he was actually really good at it and it was because of his character that a few chuckles were pulled from the audience around me
Promotional Trailer: The second promotional trailer for the movie, Prisoners. // Courtesy of MOVIECLIPS Trailers.
Like with most movies, there are aspects of the movie that I absolutely adored and there were some things I just utterly detested and sometimes, there is more I adore or there is more I detest. In this case, I have to admit that everything was pretty even for me. There weren't many things that fell into the adore category nor in the detested category. So what does that mean? That means that most of the aspects of this movie fell right in the middle and left me feeling, "Eh, could be better."
One thing that I absolutely adored and have no problem admitting, is the plot. Honestly, I believe that anyone going to see this movie is going to see this movie for one of two reasons (or both) and that is either the plot line or the cast. I've always been intrigued by stories that seem to touch on the topics of morality and how one's morality may or may not be influenced by a particular event. I love movies that leave you wondering whether or not you would do the same in the character's shoes and whether or not your ideals of what is morally sound coincides with your choice. That was initially what intrigued me and to do this day, it's still an intriguing plot line. Now here's where this movie fell into the "Eh, could be better" with the plot line. For a movie that poses the question "How far would you go to protect your child?", I was let down slightly by how mediocre the story was executed. It started off just fine, but as time progressed, it just seemed to become more and more gimmicky. That is a problem and I was just really saddened by how mediocre it seemed to play out instead of the epicness I had in mind.
The plot line being mediocre was balanced out by not only the acting done by the main cast, but also by the torture scenes and the darkness of the movie. Allow me to explain.
When I think of situations in which torture has a possibility of arising, I think of the fact that because torture is such an intense thing in terms of wording, let alone what it can mean, I hope to see and hear about things that leave me feeling terribly uncomfortable and a bit (or a lot) squirmish. More often than not, movies kind of skimp out on the torture scenes unless it's a horror or a gory movie, so I have to admit that I hadn't had any sorts of expectations for this movie. In fact, I expected them to not even have a non-graphic torture scene and instead just allude to it. But goodness me! They did not skimp on the torture scenes and for the most part, all torture scenes were graphic but kept from reaching the point of utter discomfort by alluding to more torture being done. Now, I'll openly admit this because I have no qualms about living in my own reality, I have a tendency to laugh watching movies that have torture scenes or deaths in them simply because I just find them amusing when they occur in a movie. In this case, I can't even count the number of times I would squirm watching some of the torture scenes. Yes, I still laughed (because hi habits!) and I don't regret that, but there was something about these scenes that was part amusing and part shiver inducing for me. That is something that most forms of media can't achieve from me. It's very rare for me to read a book, watch a movie or show, or listen to something that reduces me to the shivers of any kind and for me to not only have that happen but to have my expectations proven wrong, was amazing.
Now if you couldn't tell by that previous paragraph, I'm a sucker for all things dark. I love anything that has a darker tone and (/or) theme to it. That isn't to say that everything dark is good because let's be quite honest here, that's hardly the case in some instances and it's only made harder when you take into consideration that I'm a bit hard to please when it comes to entertainment. What I appreciate about the tone of this movie is that you know as soon as the movie starts that it's going to be something really twisted, morally attacking, and completely dark. Of course, it was draggy (yes, I can't help but bring it up), but the bleariness of Thanksgiving Day as the movie makes way for the desolation and desperation of the harsher colds of the beginning of winter. I love that every scene, even ones that didn't necessarily need it, had a gritty look and tone to it.
Here's where things start to get really half way for me. For as much as I loved the plot, the dark edge to the movie, the torture scenes, and how the majority of the main male cast acted, there were things that really and truly made me unsettled about the movie. For one thing, Gracie Dover (played by Maria Bello) was someone I immediately grew to detest. There was just something about her that unsettled me and it only seemed to get worse when she decided that blaming her husband for her daughter going missing was the way to go. Personally, if I were to ever have my child taken, the last thing I would do was blame my significant other for not "keeping us safe" and "protecting us from it all". It's a level of disrespect that I couldn't even ever fathom reaching. Another thing, the siblings of the missing parties, Ralph Dover and Eliza Birch, were characters that I feel were essentially created to make siblings look like arses and teens look like psuedo-intelligent, but incredibly whiny and brattish. Both Ralph and Eliza had moments where I found myself going, "Why in the bloody hell are you even here? You are so pointless and such a non-factor that it's so bloody annoying." They had moments where they through their little fits and I almost wanted to backhand them myself. I think a part of the reason I detested Ralph and Eliza as much as I did is because they remind me of the exact opposite of what I was and my mates were as teenagers and that was incredibly bothering. If it isn't obvious, what this boils down to is the fact that most, if not all, the minor characters pissed me the hell off or just bothered me senseless.
Another thing that bothered me were the plot twists. I know that I said that they kept me from getting bored with the overall movie, but at the same time, a lot of it was unnecessary. I think there were maybe one or two twists that I was okay with, but after a while, throwing in so many plot twists and attempt to shock and confusing just got a bit annoying and it was at that point I went back to multitasking; watching the movie and live tweeting. While plot twists are good, doing too many of them grows tiresome. However, as much as I can complain about the excessive amount of plot twists, it did genuinely stop the movie from being a complete bore. If you compare the plot twists to the ambiguous and open-ended ending, the plot twists actually make up for the ending.
Speaking of the ending. Uhm, no. That's it. Just know that I stand by that: No.
I realised that if I continue writing this any further, then I'll probably end up spoiling the movie, more than I unintentionally might have already. So let's get to the nitty gritty.
I recommend this movie if you're a fan of mystery, suspense, and drama. If you're a fan of movies that question what is and isn't morally sound and whether certain situations require morality, then I'd recommend you watching this. If you're a fan of graphic torture scenes and watching characters drift into slight (or intense) insanity, I'd recommend you watching this. However, if you're easily made bored, can't stand movies that seem draggy in even the slightest manner, don't enjoy plot twists no matter the frequency, and are not appealed by ambiguous endings, then I'd say pass. Personally, I think that I should have waited for it to come to DVD because it wasn't truly worth the $11 paid for it.
When the movie's over, I welcome to answer these questions (especially if there's a group of you): What lengths would you go to protect your family, especially your child? If you were in Keller's shoes would you have handled it the same way? And finally, where do the lines of morality start blur?
Maaan, that was tiring. I really tried not to spoil the movie and that's why things may or may not seem choppy when reading it. I found it a bit everywhere, but I do hope that I've managed to make things as clear as I can with a fuzzy head and drifting in and out of exhaustion. This isn't the best review, but I assure you, it was the best of movies (nor was it the worst), so I tried. Nonetheless, I'm glad I could get this out of the way.
Thing on this blog are a little slow since I'm moving in the near, near future and I'm busy with building my portfolio. However, I have a couple things in mind for the blog like how there's going to be yet another layout update in the near future and I'll also be doing posts about episodes of shows airing during this Fall season of television. As it is, I have a couple posts in mind for Sleep Hollow and Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. After I go through the fall schedule lineup and find some shows I like, I'll catch up with them and start on getting some posts out. Finally, I'm in the process of just going right ahead and making a newsletter that is actually a book club for the blog. So things are busy all around. I want to thank you lot for being patient and if you're new to following my blog (there's a couple of you), hallo!
Drop me a comment below and tell me what you're watching this season, what your plans are for the season, and whatever else tickles your fancy.